Posted by: Mudassir Ali | May 28, 2011

Cisco Unity vs. Microsoft Exchange Unified Messaging

Cisco Unity vs. Microsoft Exchange Unified Messaging

A fundamental difference between Cisco Unity and Exchange Unified Messaging is Cisco’s ability to offer end-to-end support for all system components. If a customer needs a gateway for legacy PBX integration, for example, Cisco will OEM this product and the Cisco TAC will support related issues. The customer only has to deal with one vendor for problem resolution.

In contrast, Microsoft uses Dialogic and Audiocodes gateways for these types of integrations, but does not support the gateways. For message waiting indication, Microsoft suggests a MWI application from Geomant but also does not support this solution. As such, a customer that is having an issue with something as simple as an MWI lamp lighting may have to deal with three vendors: Microsoft, Dialogic/Audiocodes, and Geomant. In contrast, Cisco stands behind the entire Cisco Unity solution.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 231 other followers

%d bloggers like this: